₦605/LITER IS OUR STARTING SUSTAINABLE PRICE FOR PETROL — GBENGA HASHIM*

_SAYS PREVIOUS SUBSIDY CLAIM WAS "ACCOUNTING MAGIC", INSISTS PETROL COULD EVENTUALLY FALL TO #200 WITHOUT REDUCING GOVERNMENT REVENUE_ 

Presidential Candidate of the Accord Party, Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, has said Nigerians should not have to pay more than ₦605 per litre for petrol under an Accord administration, arguing that the price could eventually fall to as low as ₦200 per litre if Nigeria gets its production costs and exchange rate right.

Hashim said the proposed price would represent a starting sustainable price, not an artificially subsidised price, and insisted that the reduction would not come at the expense of government revenue or Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) revenues.

“₦605 per litre is our starting sustainable price for petrol. Nobody will buy petrol above ₦610 under our government. It could be as low as ₦200.”

He said the key to achieving the price was not another opaque subsidy regime but a fundamental correction of what he described as Nigeria's distorted petroleum cost and accounting structure.

Hashim, who has consistently opposed the removal of petroleum subsidy, described the previous justification for subsidy removal as “accounting magic”, arguing that Nigeria must first establish the genuine cost of producing, refining, transporting and distributing petrol before declaring that government is subsidising consumers.

“Any time you sell a product above its legitimate cost of production, refining, transportation and insurance, you cannot call the difference between that price and an international benchmark a subsidy loss. That is opportunity cost.”

According to him, Nigeria has often approached petroleum pricing by comparing the domestic value of crude or refined products with international market prices, rather than determining what it actually costs Nigeria to produce and deliver the product to Nigerian consumers.

He said this creates a misleading impression that government is necessarily making a loss whenever Nigerians receive petroleum products below an international benchmark.

“A country does not subsidise itself simply because it chooses to use its own resources to provide affordable energy to its citizens.”

Hashim called for an independent forensic audit of Nigeria's petroleum cost structure, covering crude production, contracting, procurement, refining, transportation, storage, insurance, pipeline operations and distribution.

He said the audit should establish the actual cost of producing and delivering every litre of petrol to the Nigerian market.

“Show Nigerians the books. Publish the production cost. Publish refinery cost. Publish transportation. Publish insurance. Publish every margin. Let the data speak.”

The Accord candidate argued that Nigeria's high petroleum costs cannot simply be passed on to consumers without examining the reasons behind them.

He questioned the country's relatively high production costs compared with major oil-producing economies, arguing that contracting, procurement, insecurity, operational inefficiency and possible cost inflation deserve closer scrutiny.

“Before asking Nigerians to pay more, government must first explain why it costs so much to produce our own oil. If the cost is genuine, show us the evidence. If it is inefficiency, corruption or inflated contracting, fix it.”

Hashim said Nigerians were effectively paying twice for the weaknesses of the petroleum sector: first through inefficient and inflated production costs, and again through higher prices at the pump.

“The Nigerian people should not pay for inefficiency twice. They should not pay for inflated costs inside the system and then be told that the resulting high price is the inevitable consequence of subsidy removal.”

He said his proposed pricing framework would be based on two fundamental variables, an appropriate production cost and an appropriate exchange rate.

Hashim said his administration would target an exchange rate of between ₦525 and ₦700 to the US dollar, arguing that exchange-rate stability would substantially affect the naira cost of petroleum-sector inputs and the wider economy.

“We will achieve this strictly by ensuring appropriate production cost and appropriate exchange rate.”

He stressed that the proposed reduction would not be financed by reducing government revenue.

“The reduction will not be at the detriment of government revenue or below current FAAC. We are not going to make petrol cheaper by making government poorer.”

According to Hashim, the objective is to reduce the underlying cost of production rather than simply transfer the cost from government accounts to consumers or vice versa.

He argued that lower energy costs could also stimulate production, reduce transportation and manufacturing costs, increase household purchasing power and expand the economic base from which government generates revenue.

“Our objective is not simply cheap petrol. Our objective is a productive Nigerian economy in which affordable energy, stronger production and stronger government revenue reinforce one another.”

Hashim said the proposed ₦200–₦300 per litre price should therefore be understood as a potential medium-term outcome of correcting the country's economic fundamentals, rather than an arbitrary political promise.

“₦605 is the starting sustainable price. If we get production costs right and achieve the exchange-rate target, the price could come down to ₦200 or ₦300.”

He said the policy would also be accompanied by accelerated domestic refining, greater transparency in the petroleum value chain and measures to eliminate waste and leakages.

Hashim maintained that subsidy itself should not be treated as automatically illegitimate, provided that any intervention is transparent, targeted and designed to achieve measurable economic objectives.

“The issue is not whether government can intervene. The issue is whether government intervention is transparent, productive and accountable. Subsidy should protect Nigerians and the productive economy, not enrich intermediaries.”

He said the debate over petrol pricing should therefore move beyond political slogans and focus on the underlying data.

“Let the data speak. Tell Nigerians exactly what it costs to produce the crude, what it costs to refine it, what it costs to transport it and what every margin represents. Then we can have an honest conversation about subsidy.”

Hashim said the 2027 election should ultimately be a contest over competing economic models and not merely competing political personalities.

“Nigeria does not have to choose between affordable petrol and government revenue. We can have both. But we must stop using accounting to hide inefficiency and start using economics to build prosperity.”

https://sahelstandard.com/news/26/petrol-can-fall-to-%e2%82%a6200-per-litre-without-reducing-government-revenue-olawepo-hashim/
Loading embedded content

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

You may also like

7 items
Discussion

Atiku's Fuel Subsidy Proposal May Scare Investors, IMPI Warns

The Independent Media and Policy Initiative (IMPI) has described plans by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar to restore fuel subsidy, if elected President, as a populist proposal that may create more financial and economic problems for Nigeria in the long run. In a policy statement signed by its Chairman, Dr Omoniyi Akinsiju, the think tank noted that although the proposal would initially lead to a reduction in fuel prices, it would ultimately bankrupt the country. IMPI said: “This reckless, populist proposal represents a dangerous step backwards and a financial trap that would bankrupt Nigeria, destroy the country’s sovereign credit ratings, and wipe out the economic progress made over the past three years. “Atiku’s proposal to re-regulate prices not only directly undermines the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, but also creates an illusion of price reduction. “Fixed price caps remove commercial incentives for marketers to distribute fuel to remote areas; consequently, fuel supplies would shift to high-volume urban markets like Lagos, Abuja, Kano, and Port Harcourt.” The policy think-tank said the proposal could send a negative signal to international investors by suggesting that Nigeria was returning to regulated petrol pricing after the Federal Government had spent more than three years pursuing deregulation of the downstream oil sector. Atiku, in his proposed economic recovery plan, had advocated a shift from consumption subsidy to production subsidy, with local refineries receiving crude at a discounted price to enable them to sell refined petroleum products at lower prices to consumers. However, IMPI argued that the proposed model could create uncertainty for investors if commercial operators were required to comply with politically determined pricing arrangements. Akinsiju said the proposal would require eligible public and private refineries to receive domestic crude allocations at discounted prices on the condition that the savings were passed on to consumers. He, however, described the arrangement as convoluted, arguing that it could compel operators, including the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited and private refineries, to work within politically mandated pricing formulas. “Atiku’s proposal also sends signals to global markets that Nigeria lacks regulatory predictability. This policy shift would scare away international capital and freeze modern Public-Private Partnerships, with repercussions for funding critical legacy infrastructure projects and a damning effect on production and productivity,” he said. The group further argued that re-regulating petrol prices would undermine the Petroleum Industry Act, which established a framework for a commercially driven downstream petroleum sector. According to Akinsiju, the proposed intervention could create an “illusion of price reduction” while transferring the cost of the subsidy from direct government payments to discounted crude oil allocations. “Atiku’s proposal to re-regulate prices not only directly undermines the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, but also creates an illusion of price reduction. Fixed price caps remove commercial incentives for marketers to distribute fuel to remote areas; consequently, fuel supplies would shift to high-volume urban markets like Lagos, Abuja, Kano, and Port Harcourt,” he said. The renewed argument over subsidy comes as Nigerians continue to grapple with the impact of the policy introduced by President Bola Tinubu in May 2023. Tinubu announced the removal of petrol subsidy in his inaugural address on May 29, 2023, arguing that the policy had become unsustainable. The decision immediately triggered a sharp increase in petrol prices and transportation costs. The PUNCH reported that petrol prices rose from N175 per litre in May 2023 to about N1,300 by May 2026, representing a 643 per cent increase. The controversy has since centred on whether the fiscal gains from subsidy removal have sufficiently translated into improved living conditions for Nigerians. The Federal Government has maintained that the policy freed significant resources for the three tiers of government. According to figures presented by the Finance Minister, Taiwo Oyedele, subsidy and foreign exchange reforms mobilised N15.8tn for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025. Of the amount, N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn went to states and N3.88tn to local governments. The government, however, clarified that the N15.8tn was not money sitting in a dedicated account, but additional resources mobilised within the wider fiscal system. Backing the current model, IMPI argued that returning to a subsidised pricing model could recreate the fiscal problems associated with the old regime. Akinsiju said Nigeria had historically suffered from deductions from oil revenues to fund subsidy before resources reached the Federation Account, thereby limiting funds available to states and local governments. “Atiku’s model repeats this exact pattern. By giving discounted crude oil directly to local refineries, the government creates a massive hidden deduction. “This directly reduces the revenue flowing into the Federation Account, stripping state and local government leaders of the liquid capital needed to build rural feeder roads, primary healthcare centres, and community water infrastructure,” he said. The group also warned that price controls could result in shortages in remote areas and encourage the emergence of black markets. It said such a development could push transport costs higher and worsen food inflation, particularly for rural communities. It maintained that the government should instead focus on investments capable of increasing productivity and reducing the structural cost of doing business. “We reiterate that Nigeria’s historical infrastructure deficit cannot be solved by returning to the fiscal policies that created it,” Akinsiju said. He added that Atiku’s proposed model could amount to replacing a direct cash subsidy with a discount on crude oil revenue. “Atiku Abubakar’s ‘Follow-the-Barrel’ model replaces a cash subsidy with a crude oil revenue discount. This policy choice risks locking Nigeria back into the same historical cycle: prioritising temporary, popular relief at the pump, while sacrificing the high-quality roads, hospitals, schools, and energy networks required to build a productive national economy,” he said. https://punchng.com/fuel-subsidy-proposal-may-scare-investors-impi-warns/

Yusuf
Panic as Nigerian authorities move to debit personal bank accounts over unpaid taxesDiscussion

Panic as Nigerian authorities move to debit personal bank accounts over unpaid taxes

Panic as Nigerian authorities move to debit personal bank accounts over unpaid taxes Nigerians face yet another controversy surrounding the country’s tax laws amid Lagos Internal Revenue Service’s notice on the tax law implementation. LIRS, in a notice seen by DAILY POST at the weekend, disclosed that the tax institution has power enshrined to it by Section 60 of the Nigeria Tax Act Administration to recoup unpaid tax through direct bank debit. The Nigeria Revenue Service and the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee have not debunked the report. The chairman of the committee, Taiwo Oyedele, referred DAILY POST to his X statement, which noted that the move is the last resort for the tax authority. “The power of substitution is a tax recovery mechanism that permits the tax authority to issue a directive to a third party (a ‘substitute’) to remit funds belonging to a defaulting taxpayer to settle a final, established, and unpaid tax liability. “This power is only exercised after all legal and administrative processes, including appeals to the courts, have been exhausted,” he said in a reply to a frequently asked question on X. He further explained that the power of arbitrary substitution is neither arbitrary nor discretionary, stressing that its use is strictly governed by due process. Meanwhile, the latest clarification falls short of his earlier position, which states that the new tax laws did not empower anybody, federal, state, or local government councils, to debit personal accounts. Meanwhile, economists and financial experts poured out their thoughts on the development. Speaking, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf noted that there is a need to reconcile the conflicting positions. Reacting to the development, Yusuf said while tax reforms were necessary, the issue of tax authorities directly accessing bank accounts required clearer explanations to avoid creating fear and confusion among Nigerians.

Omogbolahan