Community Forum

But biology and primary sources are clear: African Americans are not descendants of the Moors.

Y-DNA draws a sharp line: historical Moors = North African haplogroup E1b1b (E-M81), indigenous Berbers (Amazigh) and Middle Eastern Arabs; African Americans = Sub-Saharan E1b1a (E-V38), from West and Central African peoples like the Yoruba, Igbo, Akan and Fon - never Mediterranean Maghrebi populations.

Stealing Berber-Arab identity to claim the monuments of Spain ironically insults the verified greatness of Mali, Songhai and Benin.

The movement itself: founded 1913 by Timothy Drew, rebranded "Noble Drew Ali", who told Black migrants fleeing Jim Crow they were "Moors/Asiatics" who could escape oppression with a fake Moroccan nationality.

Its holy text, the Circle 7 Koran, has nothing to do with orthodox Islam: the first 19 chapters were copied nearly word-for-word from Levi Dowling's 1908 occult book "The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ" (esoteric teachings depicting Jesus studying in India and Tibet), and the rest plagiarized from the pamphlet "Unto Thee I Grant".

He received no divine revelation - he cut up American New Age books and stamped a holy seal on them. Medieval Europeans used "Moor" carelessly for anyone dark-skinned; turning a 500-year-old vocabulary error into genetic ancestry is false. We can admire Al-Andalus without falsely claiming to have built it.

I just want to have a child without getting married.

I thought of just looking for one girl and impregnating her, but I'm scared - what if I impregnate her and she and her family members force me to marry her because of the pregnancy? Pls I need relationship experts with strong OT and orientation to guide me on how to go about this.

If you think we can discuss better on WhatsApp I'm also open to that. Thanks, all.

However, Atletico had attacking problems, so Simeone decided to use Lookman through the middle. The result? Atletico Madrid were held to a 2-2 draw by Villarreal. After the match, Simeone reportedly acknowledged that playing Lookman in that position was not ideal and apologised to the Nigerian. This is interesting because Lookman has already shown what he can do for Atletico when used in the right role.

Since joining the Spanish club, he has made a strong impression and was involved in several goals during his first few months. But this season has started differently. Lookman has yet to register a goal or assist in Atletico's opening two La Liga matches, and his positioning has become a talking point.

So, is Simeone getting it wrong? Lookman is one of Nigeria's biggest attacking talents.

We saw what he can do at Atalanta, especially during their Europa League triumph. He is a player who needs space and freedom to attack defenders. Playing him as a traditional striker could limit some of his biggest strengths.

At the same time, Atletico have limited options in attack because of injuries and player availability, so Simeone may not have had many alternatives. Still, if you have a player like Lookman, shouldn't you build your system around his strengths?

What do you think? Should Simeone stop playing Ademola Lookman as a striker and return him to the wing? Or should Lookman adapt and prove that he can also succeed as a No. 9? Let's hear from Nigerian football fans.